Review the Capstone case Chaplinsky v New Hampshire on pages 310-311 Essay

Review the Capstone case Chaplinsky v New Hampshire on pages 310-311 of your textbook. in brief discuss the issue the court had t - Essay Example135). The court said it did not stick out to any meaningful benefit to a healthy discussion of ideas and that loving order and morality be much more important than allowing someone to use profanity to castigate one type of righteousness by using free speech. The courts ruling the judge ruled that profanity has no place in society because it is a different matter altogether as compared to mere obscenity. ban already involved Gods name being used in a criticise or unflattering demeanor and should therefore be disallowed. Although previous court rulings had nullified anti-blasphemy laws in the join States before this case (such as Cantwell v Connecticut), the judge in this capstone case drew the discover as it pertains to certain acts not allowed under guise of the First Amendment protection (ibid.). The rationale a apology behind t his precedent-setting case is that there are limits to First Amendment rights. Profanity is not allowed in the same manner obscenity is outlawed and protection under First Amendment extends only to legitimate political, religious or social discussion of ideas in the spirit of free and open dialogue. It does not allow derogatory words. Moreover, the larger implication of this ruling was it reinforced the separation of the Church and State in that no single religion is favor over other religions (Christianity was favored in earlier times being the majority religion).